Seattle Bans Pet Rent and Junk Fees, Effective July 2027

Rather than banning fees broadly, the ordinance names specific prohibited categories: recurring pet rent in any frequency or under any name, package and mail collection fees, payment-method fees, in-unit appliance charges, common area access fees, and fees for landlord-required duties.

[Cite: Seattle Council Bill 121254, enacted ordinance, signed by Mayor Katie Wilson, September 16, 2026]

That defined-list approach gives landlords a concrete checklist to work against rather than a vague standard; a landlord can compare each existing fee line item directly against the named categories to determine compliance, rather than guessing at a broader, undefined concept of what counts as a "junk fee."

The ordinance specifically bans recurring pet rent, regardless of how frequently it's charged or what it's called on the lease.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That "any frequency, any name" framing closes an obvious workaround; a landlord can't simply rename pet rent as a different recurring charge, or bill it quarterly instead of monthly, to avoid the ban. The prohibition reaches the underlying recurring pet-related charge itself, not just one specific label for it.

While recurring pet rent is banned, a pet damage deposit remains an allowed fee under the ordinance.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That distinction matters practically; a landlord can still collect a one-time, refundable deposit tied to potential pet damage, the same way a standard security deposit works, but can't convert that into an ongoing monthly or periodic charge simply for having a pet in the unit.

The ordinance bans charging a fee to pay by personal check, money order, cashier's check, or ACH, while still allowing a limited returned-payment fee, capped at $31, when a payment actually fails.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That distinction targets the difference between charging extra simply for how a tenant chooses to pay, versus recovering a real cost when a payment doesn't go through; a landlord can't charge a processing fee on a normal, successful ACH payment, but can still charge a capped fee specifically when a payment bounces.

Rental advertisements, listings, applications, and a conspicuous disclosure now have to show the total monthly cost, not just a base rent figure.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That requirement means a listing advertising an attractively low base rent, while leaving mandatory fees for later disclosure, no longer satisfies Seattle's requirements; the advertised figure itself has to reflect the real total monthly cost a tenant would actually pay.

The ordinance's restrictions apply specifically to a rental agreement or lease renewal entered into after July 1, 2027; an existing tenant's current lease terms continue until that lease actually renews.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That structure means a landlord doesn't have to retroactively strip banned fees from every currently active lease the moment the ordinance takes effect; the practical compliance deadline for any individual tenancy is tied to that tenancy's own renewal date, not a single fixed calendar date across an entire portfolio.

Because Seattle requires 180 days' notice before changing housing costs, a landlord with a tenancy renewing around July 1, 2027, needs to serve any related notice roughly 6 months earlier, around early January 2027.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254; existing Seattle housing-cost notice requirements]

A landlord shouldn't treat July 2027 as the date to start thinking about compliance; for a lease renewing shortly after that date, the real action deadline, serving proper notice, arrives considerably earlier, and that deadline rolls individually for each tenancy based on its own renewal date.

Since each tenancy's notice deadline is tied to its own renewal date, a landlord managing multiple units with staggered lease terms faces a rolling series of individual deadlines rather than one single compliance date for the entire portfolio.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

A property manager needs a tracking system that flags each lease's specific 180-day notice deadline individually; treating July 1, 2027 as a single blanket deadline risks missing the earlier, tenancy-specific notice requirements that actually apply to leases renewing soon after that date.

The ordinance separately bans charging a fee for a duty the landlord is already required to perform under existing housing law.

[Cite: Council Bill 121254]

That provision closes a particular kind of workaround; a landlord can't bill a tenant for completing a task, a required inspection, a legally mandated disclosure, that the landlord already has an independent legal obligation to perform regardless of any fee.

At the time of this review, Seattle's city clerk office hadn't yet posted the final codified ordinance number for Council Bill 121254 in its public legislative record.

[Cite: Seattle City Clerk's online legislative record, as of research date]

A landlord or property manager citing this law in internal compliance documentation should confirm the final ordinance number once the city clerk's office posts it, since referencing the correct final citation matters for any formal compliance documentation going forward.

The practical starting point is auditing every current lease and fee schedule against the ordinance's specific banned-fee list, pet rent, package fees, payment-method fees, in-unit appliance charges, and fees for already-required landlord duties.

Building a tenancy-by-tenancy notice calendar, tracking each lease's individual 180-day notice deadline ahead of its renewal date, keeps a portfolio-wide rollout from collapsing into a last-minute scramble as July 2027 approaches.