Oregon Immigration Status Screening Ban 2025: 7+ ID Options Required

Before this law, Oregon's housing discrimination protections covered race and national origin; this bill creates a specific, separate protection for immigration and citizenship status.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord who assumed race and national origin protections already covered immigration status questions was working from an incomplete picture; this law closes that gap with its own explicit prohibition.

A landlord can't ask about, or disclose, a tenant, applicant, or household member's immigration or citizenship status.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

That covers both directions: asking the question in the first place, and separately, disclosing status information a landlord might have learned some other way; a landlord who happens to know an applicant's status from an unrelated conversation still can't share that information as part of the screening process.

Landlords have to accept at least 7 different forms of identification: a Social Security card, birth certificate, green card, travel or immigration visa, IRS taxpayer ID card, passport, driver's license, and other government or reasonably verifiable non-government IDs.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

That breadth is intentional; an applicant without a U.S. passport or driver's license still has multiple other documented paths to satisfy identification requirements, rather than being funneled toward documents that happen to reveal citizenship status.

A landlord can't restrict acceptable identification to only documents tied to citizenship or permanent residency.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord whose application form only lists a driver's license or passport as acceptable ID, without the other options this law requires, is effectively narrowing the list in a way that could reveal or screen based on immigration status, even without asking the prohibited question directly.

This law doesn't stop a landlord from verifying an applicant's identity or running a standard credit check as part of normal screening.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord's financial-qualification screening process can continue largely as before; what changed is the range of acceptable documentation for identity verification and the explicit bar on immigration-status-related questions, not the broader screening framework itself.

The bill's sponsor specifically cited concern that bigotry against immigrants could lead to unfair application denials or retaliation through the immigration system, framing the law as protecting vulnerable populations' ability to secure stable housing without fear.

[Cite: Oregon Senate Majority Office, Senate Bill 599 press release]

A landlord should understand this law's purpose as directly tied to housing access and stability, not simply a documentation technicality; application processes that functionally screen out applicants based on perceived immigration status undermine that purpose even without an explicit question being asked.

Since the prohibition covers both direct questions and disclosure of known status information, staff processing rental applications need specific training on what they can and can't ask or note during the intake process.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A standard rental application template that includes an informal note field where staff might jot down observations about an applicant could become a compliance risk if that field ends up capturing immigration-status-related information, even unintentionally.

A landlord weighing an applicant's income, credit history, and rental references can continue to apply those standard financial criteria; this law specifically targets immigration and citizenship status questions and documentation requirements, not financial qualification standards generally.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord denying an application based on legitimate financial criteria, properly documented and applied consistently, isn't violating this law simply because the applicant happens to be an immigrant; the law targets status-based inquiry and discrimination specifically.

A rental application form that asks for a Social Security number as a mandatory field, without accepting the other identification alternatives this law requires, likely needs revision to come into compliance.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord should review every application form and online portal for fields that implicitly require citizenship-linked documentation and update them to reflect the full range of acceptable identification this law requires.

This law adds immigration and citizenship status as its own protected category; it doesn't remove or weaken the existing race and national origin protections Oregon law already provided.

[Cite: ORS 90.303, as amended by Or. Laws 2025 ch. 226]

A landlord's overall fair housing compliance training should now specifically call out immigration and citizenship status alongside the categories that were already part of standard training, rather than treating it as implicitly covered by those older protections.

The practical starting point is auditing every application form, screening workflow, and staff training material to remove any citizenship-status-related question and confirm the full list of acceptable identification documents is actually offered to applicants.

For any screening process that currently funnels applicants toward citizenship-linked documents like a passport or Social Security number as the only accepted options, expanding that list to include the broader range of alternatives this law requires closes a compliance gap even without an explicit prohibited question being asked.