New York Landlord Compliance · Keep the right records
Tenant Information in New York City: Collection, Sharing and Retention
A landlord likes an applicant on paper and, before making an offer, runs a routine background check to be safe. That single step, at that specific moment, is itself the violation under NYC's Fair Chance for Housing Act, independent of what the check would have shown. This guide walks through the Act's required sequence, eligibility review, then a conditional offer, only then a background check, plus which criminal-history categories are even reviewable, the separate source-of-income protections under NYC Human Rights Law, and the $20 application fee cap, so a screening process holds up on every front, not just the one a landlord thought about.
The short answer
- 1.NYC's Fair Chance for Housing Act, effective January 1, 2025, requires a strict sequence: eligibility review, then a conditional written offer, and only after that a criminal background check. [NYC Local Law 24 of 2024]
- 2.Violations of the Fair Chance for Housing Act carry damages up to $125,000, and up to $250,000 for willful or malicious violations.
- 3.NYC Human Rights Law separately protects source of income, Section 8, SSI, HASA, CityFHEPS, FHEPS, the Veterans' GI Bill, and emergency assistance among the protected categories, meaning a landlord can't reject an application or advertise "no vouchers" based on how rent will be paid.
- 4.New York's application fee cap for background and credit checks is $20, though this doesn't apply to co-op or condo sale transactions, board-imposed fees, or situations where the applicant has hired their own agent.
- 5.Federal consumer report rules require notice before an adverse action based on a credit or background report, along with the report's source and the applicant's dispute rights.
- 6.This article maps each system to what it actually governs. It doesn't collapse the Fair Chance Act's specific five-step sequence into a general "be fair" principle, and it doesn't invent a fixed retention deadline the law doesn't specify.
This Covers
- · Standard residential tenant screening and record-keeping practices in New York City
- · The Fair Chance for Housing Act's required sequencing, NYC Human Rights Law's source of income protection, the state application fee cap, and federal consumer report rules
- · What can be collected, when, and what's reasonable to retain
Usually Exempt
- · Owner-occupied buildings with two or fewer units where the owner or their family lives in one unit, exempt from the Fair Chance for Housing Act specifically
- · State or federally funded housing providers with their own mandated criminal-history screening requirements, which follow a different framework than described here
- · Co-op or condo sale transactions and board-imposed fees, outside the $20 application fee cap
1. Four systems, and one of them is about order, not just content
Most tenant-information rules ask what a landlord is allowed to collect or act on. The Fair Chance for Housing Act asks something different: what order the steps happen in. A landlord who eventually makes a perfectly defensible decision can still violate the law if a background check happened at the wrong point in the process, before a conditional offer rather than after. That's a genuinely different kind of compliance risk than the other three systems covered here, which govern what information matters, not when it's reviewed.
Keeping this distinction in mind changes how a landlord should actually build a screening workflow: the Fair Chance Act needs to be built into the sequence of steps itself, not just checked as a substantive rule at the end
Do this instead
Map your screening process as an ordered sequence of steps, not a checklist of considerations, and confirm the Fair Chance Act's specific ordering is built into that sequence before anything else.
2. The Fair Chance for Housing Act's required sequence
Effective January 1, 2025, the Act applies to most NYC rentals, sales, co-ops, and condo boards, with two specific exemptions: owner-occupied buildings of two or fewer units where the owner or their family lives in one, and state or federally funded housing providers who have their own mandated criminal-history requirements. Within covered housing, the process has to run in a specific order. First, a landlord evaluates general eligibility, income, credit, references, without any inquiry into criminal history, and can't include background-check language in advertisements or applications. Second, if the applicant clears that review, the landlord extends a conditional written offer based solely on those non-criminal factors. Only after that conditional offer can a criminal background check happen, and only if the landlord chooses to run one at all.
If the check turns something up, an individualized assessment follows, not an automatic reversal of the offer, and the applicant gets a copy of the rights notice, the criminal history information reviewed, and 5 business days to respond with corrections, context, or evidence of rehabilitation before any final decision. A landlord who wants to withdraw the offer has to provide a written explanation connecting the specific criminal history to a legitimate business interest.
Do this instead
Physically restructure your application form and process checklist so a background check literally cannot be initiated before a conditional offer has been documented, rather than relying on staff discipline to remember the order each time.
3. What can actually be considered, and what can't
Even after a conditional offer, the range of criminal history a landlord can weigh is narrow. Only three categories are reviewable: current sex offense registry convictions, felony convictions within five years of release or sentencing, and misdemeanor convictions within three years of release or sentencing. Everything else is off the table regardless of timing: sealed or expunged convictions, violations, certain out-of-state convictions, adjournments in contemplation of dismissal, juvenile adjudications, arrests and pending cases, and any favorable termination, an acquittal, a reversal on appeal, an exoneration.
This is a meaningfully narrower list than "anything on a background check," and treating an unreviewable category as fair game because it showed up in a report is a common, costly mistake given the statute's damages exposure, up to $125,000 in civil damages generally, and up to $250,000 where a violation is found willful or malicious.
Do this instead
Train whoever reviews a post-offer background check to check each item against the three reviewable categories specifically, and to set aside everything else automatically, rather than evaluating a report holistically.
4. Source of income: a separate protection, not a Fair Chance Act add-on
NYC Human Rights Law protects an applicant's source of income independently of the Fair Chance for Housing Act, covering Section 8, Supplemental Security Income, HIV/AIDS Services Administration assistance, CityFHEPS, FHEPS, the Veterans' GI Bill, and one-time emergency or security-deposit assistance grants, among other categories. A landlord can't reject an application because of how rent will be paid, can't advertise "no vouchers," and can't delay or refuse necessary repairs because a tenant pays with public assistance. This protection applies to nearly all NYC rentals, including apartments in co-op and condo buildings.
This is worth separating clearly from the Fair Chance Act in a landlord's own compliance process, since the two systems protect different things: one governs criminal history sequencing, the other governs how rent is funded, and a landlord could be fully compliant on one while violating the other.
Do this instead
Remove any income-source language from listings and applications entirely, no voucher restrictions, no "must be employment income" requirement, and evaluate ability to pay through the amount and reliability of income rather than its source.
5. Application fees and consumer reports
New York caps the fee a landlord, sub-lessor, or grantor can charge for background and credit checks at $20. This cap doesn't apply to co-op or condo sale transactions, fees a co-op or condo board imposes directly, or situations where the prospective tenant has hired their own agent. On top of the state fee cap, federal consumer report rules apply whenever a credit or background report factors into a decision: the applicant is entitled to notice before an adverse action is taken based on that report, along with the name of the reporting agency and information about their right to dispute inaccuracies in the report.
Do this instead
Confirm your $20 fee actually covers only the background and credit check cost it's meant to, and build a standard adverse-action notice into your process for any decision that draws on a credit or background report, rather than relying on an informal verbal explanation.
6. Retention: the same no-fixed-number discipline
Neither NYC's local rules nor the state and federal frameworks above set a specific numeric retention period for tenant screening records. The governing principle, consistent with how this series treats retention across jurisdictions, is to keep information only as long as there's a genuine legal or business reason to hold it, destroying application and screening materials once a decision is finalized and there's no ongoing purpose, rather than defaulting to indefinite storage.
Reading this as a tenant?
If a landlord ran a background check before making you a conditional offer, or rejected you for using a housing voucher, both of those are specific, separately enforceable violations under NYC law. A conditional offer should come first, based only on non-criminal factors, and how you pay rent shouldn't factor into the decision at all.
