Platuni

California Landlord Compliance · End a tenancy

California Eviction Summons Service Law 2027 (AB 747)

A landlord who wins an eviction by default, because the tenant never showed up, is about to face a higher documentation bar for proving that tenant was actually served. AB 747, known as the Service of Process Accountability, Reform and Equity Act, is already signed into law in California. It just isn't operative yet.

Written by Platuni

The short answer

  1. 1.AB 747, the SPARE Act, is already enacted as Chapter 563, Statutes of 2025, but its requirements don't take effect until January 1, 2027.
  2. 2.Before a landlord can use substitute service or posting, "reasonable diligence" now means attempting personal delivery on at least three occasions, on three different days, at three different times.
  3. 3.Unlawful detainer complaints must state the date, time, and location of effected service of the termination notice, not just the method used.
  4. 4.Proof of service must include photographs of the service location with a readable timestamp and GPS coordinates, or a written explanation if GPS data isn't available.
  5. 5.California's process server registry becomes publicly searchable under the same law.
  6. 6.None of this applies to service already completed before January 1, 2027; the current rules still govern eviction filings underway now.

This covers

  • · Every unlawful detainer (eviction) case filed in a California court
  • · Service of the summons and complaint attempted on or after January 1, 2027
  • · Landlords, property managers, attorneys, and registered process servers handling that service

Usually exempt

  • · Service completed before January 1, 2027, which follows the current rules
  • · The termination notice itself, the 3-day, 30-day, or other notice period a tenant is owed, isn't restructured by this law
  • · Other categories of California civil cases affected by parts of AB 747 outside the unlawful detainer context, which this article doesn't cover in detail

1. What AB 747 is, and when it actually takes effect

AB 747 was signed and chaptered as Chapter 563, Statutes of 2025, on October 10, 2025. It is already law in the sense that matters for tracking legislation: it passed and was signed, not merely proposed. What it isn't yet is operative. None of the requirements described in this article apply to service performed before January 1, 2027.

[Cite: AB 747, Stats. 2025, ch. 563]

The bill amends several sections of the Code of Civil Procedure that govern how any California civil lawsuit is served, and it adds language specific to unlawful detainer cases, the court filing a landlord makes once a termination notice period has run out and the tenant hasn't moved. This article focuses on the pieces that change an eviction filing specifically.

[Cite: California Courts, Judicial Council of California, Invitation to Comment SPR26-08]

2. The new "reasonable diligence" standard before substitute service

Existing law already required a plaintiff to show "reasonable diligence" in attempting personal delivery before falling back on substitute service or posting. AB 747 defines that standard in concrete, countable terms for the first time: attempting personal delivery of the summons and complaint, in good faith, on at least three occasions, on three different days, at three different times.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure section 415.20]

For unlawful detainer cases specifically, a comparable diligence showing now governs posting and mailing service under amended Code of Civil Procedure section 415.45. A landlord or process server who currently makes one or two attempts before posting a summons will need to document three, spread across different days and times, once this section becomes operative.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure section 415.45]

3. What eviction complaints must now state about the termination notice

AB 747 amends Code of Civil Procedure section 1166, the statute setting out what an unlawful detainer complaint must contain. Going forward, a complaint must state the date, time, and location of effected service of the termination notice, in addition to identifying the method used to serve it.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure section 1166]

This is a documentation requirement layered on top of existing practice, not a change to how much notice a tenant is owed or what a valid termination notice has to say. A landlord who already keeps a clear, dated log of exactly when and how a notice was served shouldn't find this difficult. A landlord relying on memory or informal notes will need a more disciplined record starting January 1, 2027.

4. New photo and GPS documentation for proof of service

Under amended Code of Civil Procedure section 417.10, proof of service must include one or more photographs of the site of each effected or attempted service, carrying a readable timestamp showing the date and time, along with GPS coordinates identifying the location. If GPS data isn't available for a given attempt, the person serving the papers must explain why in a written statement filed with the proof of service.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure section 417.10]

A new Judicial Council form, POS-012, has been proposed specifically to help parties document compliance with this standard in a consistent format.

[Cite: California Courts, Judicial Council of California, Invitation to Comment SPR26-08]

5. The process server registry becomes public

AB 747 also amends Business and Professions Code section 22355, making California's process server registry information publicly searchable. A landlord or attorney working with a process server will be able to independently verify that server's registration rather than relying solely on the server's own representation.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Business and Professions Code section 22355]

6. What happens when service documentation falls short

AB 747 amends the Code of Civil Procedure sections governing default judgments and motions to set them aside, sections 473 and 473.5, and adds a new section, 473.2, addressing improper service specifically. Together, these changes give a tenant a clearer statutory path to challenge a default judgment obtained through an eviction filing if the underlying service didn't meet the documentation standard described above.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure sections 473, 473.2, and 473.5]

For a landlord, the practical effect is that a default judgment resting on thin or undocumented service becomes more exposed to being set aside after January 1, 2027 than it is under current law. A default judgment obtained today, before the operative date, is evaluated under the rules in place when service occurred.

7. What to do before January 1, 2027

Nothing in AB 747 requires action before its operative date, and the roughly fourteen-month gap between chaptering and enforcement gives property managers time to prepare rather than scramble. Anyone relying on an outside process server for eviction filings should confirm that vendor already uses, or is transitioning to, timestamped and GPS-tagged photographs and a specific log of attempt dates, times, and locations, well before the deadline rather than discovering a gap during an active unlawful detainer case.

Property managers who self-serve or manage in-house service logistics for smaller portfolios face the same requirement directly. Building the habit of logging three distinct attempts, on three different days and times, before falling back to posting or substitute service, is worth starting now even though the deadline is more than a year out.

8. How the diligence requirement can affect eviction timelines

Requiring three attempts, on three different days, at three different times, before a landlord can fall back on posting or substitute service is a higher bar than many process servers currently document. If a tenant is difficult to locate at home, meeting that standard could take longer than the one or two attempts some servers currently log before posting. This doesn't change the length of the termination notice period itself, but it can extend the time between filing an unlawful detainer complaint and reaching the point where service is complete and the case can move toward a default judgment if the tenant doesn't respond.

[Cite: AB 747, amending Code of Civil Procedure section 415.20]

Landlords who currently budget a fixed number of days between filing and expected service completion should build in additional lead time starting January 1, 2027, particularly for tenants who aren't reliably home during standard daytime hours.

Reading this as a tenant?

AB 747 doesn't change how much notice you're entitled to before an eviction lawsuit is filed. It changes how a landlord or process server must document their attempts to serve you with the actual court summons and complaint afterward. Starting January 1, 2027, if you were never properly served and a default judgment was entered against you, this law gives you a clearer basis to challenge that judgment.

Sources and review

  1. 1.AB 747 (Service of Process Accountability, Reform and Equity Act), Chapter 563, Statutes of 2025, chaptered text.
  2. 2.California Courts, Judicial Council of California, Invitation to Comment SPR26-08, rules and forms implementing AB 747.

Substantive review means an editor re-checked each cited section against the current code, not that the page was re-saved. Corrections: compliance@platuni.com.

Frequently asked questions

Is AB 747 already law, or is it still a proposal working through the legislature?

It's already enacted. It was signed and chaptered as Chapter 563, Statutes of 2025, on October 10, 2025. What hasn't happened yet is that it isn't operative: none of its requirements apply until January 1, 2027.

Does this change how much notice a tenant must receive before an eviction?

No. It changes how service of the court summons and complaint, and of the earlier termination notice, must be documented. The length of a notice period a tenant is owed isn't affected.

What counts as "reasonable diligence" before substitute service is allowed?

Attempting personal delivery of the summons and complaint, in good faith, on at least three occasions, on three different days, at three different times.

What has to change in an unlawful detainer complaint itself?

The complaint must state the date, time, and location of effected service of the termination notice, not just the method used to serve it.

What's the new photo requirement for proof of service?

Proof of service must include photographs of the service location carrying a readable date and time stamp and GPS coordinates, or a written explanation if GPS data wasn't available for a given attempt.

When do landlords actually need to be compliant?

January 1, 2027. Service performed before that date is evaluated under the rules in place at the time.